A periodic access review is a short check that the team’s VPN assignments still match real people, real devices, and current needs. It is not a live-session audit and it does not require collecting profile files or credentials.

For a small team, the review can be a 20–30 minute pass through the access inventory after staff changes, device replacements, or profile updates.

Prepare three simple sources

Before starting, gather:

  1. the current team or contractor list;
  2. the VPN access inventory;
  3. the current profile labels or status information available through the approved source.

That is usually enough. Do not ask people to send their profile files, passwords, tokens, or screenshots containing sensitive details.

Check people and responsibilities

Start with the roster:

Update the inventory or create a clear follow-up item for anything that no longer matches. The review should make ownership clearer, not simply produce more notes.

Check devices

Next, compare each assignment with the device it is meant for:

A profile file remaining on an old device does not prove that the assignment is current. Use the approved status source and the inventory rather than guessing from local files.

Check profile revisions

Look for profiles that were replaced or reissued:

The review does not need the technical contents of either version. It only needs a clear old-to-current relationship.

Check records that are waiting for action

Pay attention to statuses such as:

For each one, decide one next action and one person responsible for it. Keep the note simple: what needs to happen and when it should be checked again.

Avoid leaving vague entries such as temporary, maybe old, or ask later with no owner.

Check the setup documentation

A quick review should also confirm that the team’s setup notes still point to:

Remove or replace screenshots that show outdated menus or unnecessary personal information. Do not add profile contents or credentials in an attempt to make the guide more complete.

Use a short review checklist

A practical sequence is:

  1. Compare the inventory with the current roster.
  2. Confirm each active assignment has a clear owner and purpose.
  3. Check whether the listed device is still in use.
  4. Confirm the recorded profile revision is current.
  5. Review assignments marked Awaiting setup or Needs review.
  6. Check recent onboarding, offboarding, and device-replacement changes.
  7. Confirm shared equipment has a responsible owner.
  8. Update stale setup links or screenshots.
  9. Assign a next step to anything unresolved.
  10. Record when the next review should happen.

The result should be a cleaner, more accurate inventory—not a collection of secrets or an oversized audit report.

Decide how often to review

The right cadence depends on how often the team changes. A stable team may only need a quarterly check. A team with frequent contractors or device changes may benefit from a monthly review.

Also run a focused review after:

What a useful outcome looks like

At the end of the review:

That is enough for a small-team review. Formal audit terminology and complex approval chains are unnecessary unless the organization already has a documented process that requires them.

Frequently asked questions

Is this the same as monitoring active VPN sessions?
No. It reviews assignments, devices, and records. It does not show who is connected at a specific moment.

How often should we run the checklist?
Use a cadence that matches team changes—often monthly or quarterly—and run an extra check after significant onboarding, offboarding, device replacement, or profile reissue work.

Should reviewers collect profile files to confirm the revision?
No. Use non-sensitive profile labels, inventory records, and the approved status source. Do not collect profile contents or credentials.

What should happen when something is unclear?
Assign one owner and one next step. A clear follow-up is more useful than a long note with no decision.